Skip to content

Cybersecurity Risk Assessments

Understand How Your Cybersecurity and Information Risk Program Functions Today

Risk assessments are the foundation of a strong cybersecurity strategy, helping organizations identify vulnerabilities before attackers do. They provide a clear view of where your greatest risks lie, allowing you to prioritize resources and defenses effectively. By proactively evaluating threats, you reduce the likelihood of costly breaches and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Risk assessments turn uncertainty into informed action - protecting your data, operations, and reputation.

Talk to an Expert

Cybersecurity and Control Risk Assessments

Cybersecurity assessments are essential tools for understanding and strengthening your organization's security posture. These assessments typically fall into two key categories: (i) cybersecurity risk assessments and (ii) cybersecurity controls assessments. While both are interconnected, each serves a distinct purpose - one identifies what is important to you and where your vulnerabilities lie, and the other evaluates how well your defenses are working. Together, they provide a comprehensive view of your organization's ability to prevent, detect, and respond to cyber threats.

Risk Assessment

A cybersecurity risk assessment focuses on identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing risks that could impact your organization’s information systems and data. It evaluates potential threats, the likelihood of those threats occurring, and the potential impact on your operations. This process helps decision-makers allocate resources effectively, implement targeted safeguards, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. A well-executed risk assessment not only highlights where your organization is most vulnerable but also lays the groundwork for strategic planning. Importantly, a complete risk assessment includes a thorough evaluation of your existing security controls to determine their effectiveness in mitigating those risks.

Controls Assessment

A cybersecurity controls assessment dives deeper into the specific safeguards your organization has in place—such as firewalls, access controls, encryption, and monitoring systems. These controls are the mechanisms that protect your systems, data, and users from cyber threats. Understanding the strength, coverage, and performance of these controls is critical to ensuring they align with your risk profile and compliance obligations. Without a clear picture of your controls, it’s impossible to know whether your defenses are adequate or where improvements are needed. This assessment empowers organizations to close security gaps, improve resilience, and demonstrate due diligence to stakeholders and regulators alike.

Assessment Methodology

Assessment Methodology

A risk assessment methodology is a structured, repeatable approach used to identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks within an organization. It defines the steps, criteria, tools, and metrics used during the assessment process—such as how threats are identified, how likelihood and impact are measured, and how risk levels are calculated. This methodology acts as the foundation for the entire assessment, ensuring that the process is not only thorough but also aligned with the organization’s objectives, regulatory requirements, and risk tolerance.
 
Having a clearly defined methodology is essential because it brings consistency, objectivity, and credibility to the risk assessment process. A strong methodology improves the quality of results by reducing bias, ensuring all relevant factors are considered, and enabling more accurate prioritization of risks. It also allows organizations to track progress over time. When the same methodology is used across multiple assessments, businesses can confidently compare results, identify trends, and measure the effectiveness of their security improvements. This consistency is key to making informed, data-driven decisions and demonstrating due diligence to stakeholders, auditors, and regulators.

BorderHawk Methodology

 

The objective of the BorderHawk Methodology is to develop a consistent conclusion regarding the risk to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information created, received, stored, or transmitted by the organization.

We use the following definitions for confidentiality, availability, and integrity:

  • Confidentiality - the circumstances whereby data or information is made available or disclosed to unauthorized persons or processes.
  • Integrity - the circumstances whereby data or information has not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner.
  • Availability - the circumstances whereby data or information is accessible and usable upon demand by an authorized person.

Based on our collective experience, we utilize a qualitative approach for assessing information risk. The qualitative method uses specific language to describe information risk - an activity or lack of activity associated with information management scored on a scale of 1-10 and described as either a low risk, medium risk, or high risk. We have found this approach to be most effective in rapidly developing corresponding mitigation plans.

Our intent is to maximize results through;

  • Examination of Specific Key Criteria - Key criteria are identified for application of the Information Risk Assessment control and examined for impact to People, Processes, Technology, and Facilities.
  • Determination of Practice - Interviews are structured to gain a complete understanding of current operational practices and to evaluate the familiarity and consistency of application.
  • Results Reporting - Results are reported based on defined criteria and color-coded describing compliance risk associated with each control.

Our methodology employs a probing technique for framing and analyzing the subject matter associated with each area of risk inquiry. The approach is known as IRAC. IRAC is an acronym for Issue - Rule - Analysis - Conclusion.

The process for assessing each Information Security Management Control Area, and its subcomponents, are as follows;

  • Identify the Control purpose, State it as an Issue and then inquire about the organization's efforts within the control area through a series of questions.
  • With reference to the Rule (the pertinent regulation or standard's control requirements), perform an Analysis for compliance of the organization's activities with respect to that rule.
  • Use the Conclusion derived by that analysis to drive understanding risk.

Accordingly, this assessment uses the following collection techniques;

  • Collecting documented policies, processes, procedures, in soft or hard copy, for review.
  • Interviewing knowledge and available staff members.
  • Observing while onsite.
  • Use the Conclusion derived by that analysis to drive understanding risk.

In analyzing each answer, we consider the presence of expected information security management controls;

  • Has the organization implemented a specific control or does some other mitigating factor assist in providing an adequate protective measure?
    • The answer to each of these questions will essentially by a yes or a no.
  • Does the implemented control appear to provide a necessary protective measure (quality)?

The BorderHawk Process

The BorderHawk process for assessments, from document collection, through interviews, to final reporting, takes approximately 6-8 weeks. Our process consists of 10 activities including;

 

1
Scoping

2
Document Collection

3
Initial Interviews

4
Physical Walk-Through

5
Onsite Interviews

6
Analysis

7
Secondary Interviews

8
Reporting

9
Initial Findings Review

10
Final Report Review 

Risk Assessment Options

Risk assessments should be tailored to each organization. Some groups are ready to learn and handle much of the process themselves, while others need more guidance, onsite checks, or a fully independent review by cybersecurity experts. BorderHawk offers several risk assessment options so you can choose the level of support that matches your goals, resources, and budget. Whether you want a simple starting point, a hands-on approach, a deeper review, or a full external assessment, each option is built to turn uncertainty into clear, practical risk insights. 

Seminar Risk Assessment

The Seminar Risk Assessment helps organizations learn how to carry out a cybersecurity risk assessment with clear guidance, while also building the skills to do most of the work on their own.

This option uses a webinar format that divides the risk assessment process into easy-to-follow modules. The seminar covers key activities like stakeholder interviews, asset inventory, risk evaluation, and compliance checks. It is made for people with all levels of technical experience, helping everyone understand how the process works and why each step is important.

The Seminar Risk Assessment is a good first step for organizations starting to formalize their cybersecurity risk management, looking to rely less on outside help, or needing a practical way to create a full, documented assessment. After the seminar, participants can get consulting support to ask questions, check their work, and get advice as they finish the assessment. 

Process Overview

  • Delivery of a webinar-style seminar broken into structured training modules.

  • Coverage of key risk assessment components, including stakeholder interviews, asset inventory, risk evaluation, and compliance alignment.

  • Participants complete learning independently with guidance suited for both technical and non-technical personnel.

  • Post-session consulting calls provide personalized support, helping participants finalize their risk assessment.

Workshop Risk Assessment

The Workshop Risk Assessment takes the Seminar Risk Assessment further by offering a more hands-on experience. Instead of just teaching, BorderHawk works directly with your team over several sessions as you carry out a real assessment using your own data.

This option is for organizations that want to build their own skills but also want more direct help along the way. Participants work on assessment tasks during and between sessions, while BorderHawk offers expert advice, reviews, and feedback. This leads to a risk assessment that is customized to your actual operations, assets, risks, and compliance needs.

While the seminar helps you understand the process, the workshop lets you put it into practice. It is especially helpful for teams who want to learn by doing, work more consistently, and create a useful risk assessment with support throughout.

Process Overview

  • Multi-week engagement with direct BorderHawk facilitation.

  • Participants conduct their own risk assessment during and between working sessions.

  • Real organizational data is used to ensure the final product is relevant and actionable.

  • BorderHawk provides expert support, reviews, and guidance at each stage of the assessment.

  • Emphasis on practical skill development and producing a complete, organization-specific risk assessment.

Workshop + Onsite Risk Assessment

The Workshop + Onsite Risk Assessment adds an onsite visit to the standard Workshop Risk Assessment for deeper insight and validation. It keeps the hands-on, guided approach, but also includes direct observation of your environment and in-person talks with key team members.

This model is helpful when paperwork and remote interviews do not show everything. During the onsite visit, BorderHawk walks through your environment and leads in-person cybersecurity discussions with IT, OT, and other key people. These steps can reveal risks that might not show up in documents or standard interviews, such as physical security gaps, environmental issues, undocumented practices, or real-world challenges that affect cybersecurity.

After the onsite visit, the process continues remotely with the same guided workshop format. This approach gives you both direct observation and a chance to build your own skills. Compared to the standard workshop, this option offers a more detailed assessment by combining your real data, guided sessions, and onsite validation.

Process Overview

  • Conduct an onsite physical walkthrough of facilities and operational areas.

  • Facilitate in-person cybersecurity and risk discussions with key personnel from IT, OT, and other relevant teams.

  • Identify physical, procedural, and undocumented risks that may not surface during remote sessions.

  • Resume the structured workshop format remotely, guiding the client through completion of the risk assessment.

  • Deliver a combined, comprehensive assessment informed by both onsite findings and workshop-based analysis.

BH Conducted Risk Assessment

The BH Conducted Risk Assessment is the most thorough and externally supported option. Here, BorderHawk takes over the main responsibility for the assessment, performing it directly instead of just teaching or guiding your team.

This option is for organizations that need independent validation, extra assurance, or more help because they lack the resources to do a detailed cybersecurity risk assessment themselves. BorderHawk follows a structured process that includes reviewing documents, interviewing stakeholders, making onsite observations, and doing a full analysis.

The result is a formal, practical report that gives an objective look at your cybersecurity and a clear plan for improvement. Unlike the other options, the BH Conducted Risk Assessment offers the most direct involvement from BorderHawk and is best for organizations that need an independent, expert-led assessment to support compliance, planning, decision-making, or program upgrades.

Process Overview

  • Conduct a comprehensive review of existing cybersecurity documentation.

  • Interview key stakeholders across operational, IT, and security domains.

  • Perform onsite observations to validate processes, environment design, and real-world practices.

  • Analyze collected evidence using BorderHawk’s formal assessment methodology.

  • Produce a detailed, actionable report aligning findings with regulatory requirements and organizational needs.